Model CJ '12
First session of the Model Courts of Justice was held in Faculty of Law, Ankara University in February 2012 as the very first court simulation conference of Turkey. Under the leadership of founding Secretary-General Ms. Şeyma OLGUN and Director-General Ms. Dicle Su HAN, Model CJ 2012 hosted International Court of Justice with a maritime delimitation case, for the first time in Turkey with the participation of law students from different universities. A dual structure was followed with two different study guides specific for judges and advocates.
Model CJ '13
As the one and only court simulation conference giving the law students chance to have a better understanding about the working process of international Courts, second session of the Model Courts of Justice was held in Faculty of Law, Ankara University, in February 2013 under the leadership of Ms. Selcen CAN, Secretary-General and Mr. Çağrı YILMAZ, Director-General. In addition to International Court of Justice with its case concerning the Kuril Islands Dispute between Japan and Russia, International Criminal Court was simulated for the first time in the Turkey with the case Prosecutor v. Jean-Pierre Bemba Gombo and Criminal Law welcomed as the second traditional law branch of Model CJ beside International Public Law.
Model CJ '14
Spreading its wings to a wider vision, third simulation of Model Courts of Justice 2014 held in Litai Hotel of Turkish Bar Association, in February 2014, under the leadership of Ms. Fatma Betül BODUR, Secretary-General and Ms. Arzum KOCA, Director-General, in February 2014 with participants from different countries. While International Crimal Court dealt with case Prosecutor v. Saif Al-Islam Gaddafi and Abdullah Al-Senussi, two jurisdictions of International Court of Justice took place at the same time. The Northwest (North-western) Passage Disputewas brought before the Contentious Jurisdiction of ICJ while the first simulation of the Advisory Jurisdiction of Turkey went deeper in the doctrine and examined the lawfulness of armed intervention to protect human rights. Students who are not studying law were welcomed under the roof of Human Rights Council Advisory Committee, in its very first simulation for the country, agenda item being Promotion of an Equitable International Order in the Light of Cultural Relativism.
Model CJ '15
With three brand-new courts, Model Courts of Justice reached her widest extend in the fourth session held in Litai Hotel, in February 2015, under the leadership of Mr. Arif Erkut ÖZKAN, Secretary-General and Mr. Barışcan ERDEMİR, Director-General. While International Court of Justice Advisory Jurisdiction answered one of most discussed questions of international community at that time: Is the Outcome of the Crimean Referendum of 16th of March 2014 in Accordance with International Law?, Human Rights Council Advisory Committee issued Stateless People:Citizenship Rights in the Context of Natural Law and Civil Law Dichotomy agenda item. In their very first simulations in Turkey; European Court of Human Rightsadjudicated over the case of Ponte and Fabozzi v. Italy regarding the Legal Recognition of Same-Sex Couples and Same-Sex Marriage, International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea solved the Svalbard Islands Dispute between United Kingdom and Norway while lastly the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia Appeal Chamber evaluated the appeal cases of Dusko Tadic and Drogoljub Kunarac.
Model CJ '16
Keeping its boutique structure, fifth session of Model Courts of Justice held in Litai Hotel, in February 2016, under the leadership of Ms. Kevser Neşe GÜNAL, Secretary-General and Mr. Özkan Emre ÖZAĞAR, Director-General. A new approach was taken for Criminal Law by simulating not a Criminal Law court but Office of the Prosecutor of International Criminal Court, for the first time in Turkey, where participants decided whether the crimes committed during the Gaza Conflict should be brought before ICC thus analyzed the main principles of crime. In their first simulations in the country, Supreme Court of United States issued an important deadlock of Human Rights Law, Legality of Euthanasia within the perspective of common law while the Ad Hoc Committee on International Terrorism discussed a very well-known agenda item; International Terrorism in a new legal context, within the doctrinal debates of scope of implementing state responsibility. In addition to them, as the most traditional court of Model CJ,International Court of Justice Contentious Jurisdiction opened its door once again for the participants for the decision of Legal Status of the Caspian Sea while the European Court of Human Rights, after showing how suitable it is to simulations addressed a dilemma under its Convention in its second year; Freedom of Expression vs. Right to Reputation.
Model CJ '17